Articles Comments

Peace Watch » Archive

Nawaz Sharif’s Kashmir Policy?

Nawaz Sharif’s Kashmir Policy?

    Z.G. MUHAMMAD     Democracy has started striking strong roots in Pakistan. The massive turnout of voters during the election and smooth transition of power testified it. How this massive mandate helps in putting the country back on the track and restoring its image as a key global player will depend upon commitment of the PML (N) leadership to their country and its ideology. On Wednesday, Nawaz Sharif started his third innings as Prime Minister of Pakistan- the earlier … Read entire article »

Filed under: Editor's Take

In Defence of M.A. Jinnah

In Defence of M.A. Jinnah

Mountbatten, Jinnah and Nehru M. YUSUF BUCH To hold Jinnah “solely responsible” for the Kashmir dispute is, of course, sheer calumny but sentiment and ethics apart, it is also a breathtakingly grotesque contention.  From the whole tangle of personalities, Indian, Pakistani or Kashmiri involved in the origination and hardening of the dispute either by commission or by omission, it foists blame on the one whose role was least indictable, indeed most honorable and based on perspicuous judgment. … Read entire article »

Filed under: Featured, Perspectives

Who Are They To Tell You This

Books And ‘National Narratives’ Z.G. MUHAMMAD     Four new books, published from Srinagar during May vied for space in my small work place. Out of them, two have been written inside the Central Jail, Srinagar by two prisoners Dr. Muhammad Shafi Khan Shariati and Dr. Muhammad Qasim. Both convicted for life. Ess Ahmed Pirzada and Shabnam Qayoom have authored the other two. The book by Dr. Muhammad Shafi Khan Shariati is an Urdu translation of controversial book ‘The Clash of Civilization and the Remaking of World Order’ by Samuel P Huntington. Translated into almost every important language in the world the book has been for past two decades at the centre of discussion in academia, passageways of power in the West and the Muslim World. Seen as gospel for Muslim bashing the adversaries of … Read entire article »

Filed under: Editor's Take, Kashmir-Talk

Dr. Abdul Ahad Remembers Shameem Ahmed Shameem

Dr. Abdul Ahad Remembers Shameem Ahmed Shameem

REMINISCING SHAMIM AHMAD SHAMIM   By   Dr. Abdul Ahad Reminiscing Shamim Ahmad Shamim takes me deep down into the dark recesses of my unconscious and stimulates the bottomless alleys of my thought to have vivid recollections of the immensely pleasing native tang and aroma Kashmir was then distinctly known for throughout the world. Bringing back yesteryears scenes with both their thrill and languor, it jogs my memory of long-gone college days which, I confess, were too riotous to be … Read entire article »

Filed under: Featured

Why I Rebutted Noorani?

Why I Rebutted Noorani?

    Z.G. Muhammad   Sitting in the backroom of a shop on the fashionable Residency Road, a “friend” of A.G. Noorani, complained that I and few other columnists were not ‘just and fair’ to author of book, ‘The Kashmir Dispute-1947-2012’. Taking an exception to my column in response  to the speech of the octogenarian lawyer and writer at the inaugural function of the Silver Jubilee celebrations of the Greater Kashmir he was of the view that instead of … Read entire article »

Filed under: Editor's Take

The Kashmir Dispute And The History Dr. Abdul Ahad’s Take

The Kashmir Dispute And The History Dr. Abdul Ahad’s Take

 By Dr. Abdul Ahad      Our leaders’ understanding of Kashmir dispute is pitiable. So is that of the jobbing “historians” who leave no stone unturned to conjure up sensational narratives with a storyline too far-fetched? On the one hand our leaders believe that Sheikh Sahib was signatory to the “Instrument of Accession” (pls. See SAS Geelani’s statement GK, May 17, 2013, which he seems to have made inadvertently) and on the other the jobbing “historians” absolve him … Read entire article »

Filed under: Editor's Take

A.G.Noorani On A Slippery Wicket

A.G.Noorani On A Slippery Wicket

Z.G. Muhammad On two counts, I thank A.G. Noorani, one, for titling his book as, ‘The Kashmir Dispute 1947-2012.’  (No one now in New Delhi likes to call Kashmir as a ‘dispute’.  Instead,   they grapple with some “palatable” softer phrases for describing the imbroglio.) Two, for bringing question of the ‘accession of Jammu and Kashmir to India’ once again into sharp focus through his speech. In his speech on the release of his book, he made … Read entire article »

Filed under: Editor's Take, Kashmir-Talk